<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop CS4 to be 64-bit on Windows Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/</link>
	<description>By geeks. For geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil D</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out my blunder! Glad to know people are always at the ready to jump on a mistake and correct it! It warms my heart, really! :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out my blunder! Glad to know people are always at the ready to jump on a mistake and correct it! It warms my heart, really! <img src='http://www.curtsbasement.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hire, but yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hire, but yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil D</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-236</guid>
		<description>High = Higher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High = Higher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil D</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Well apparently Adobe has jerked Apple around in the past. I can&#039;t remember the specifics right now, but Adobe was holding out on Apple, so Apple decided to high a bunch of programmers and made Aperture.

Now what they are doing is making Aperture OSL and allowing all the people that make the awesome add-ons for photoshop to make and include them in Aperture when it is purchased. These add-ons up until recently were only available with Adobe Photoshop.

This has obviously pissed off Adobe, since now they will have a rival that offers everything they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well apparently Adobe has jerked Apple around in the past. I can&#8217;t remember the specifics right now, but Adobe was holding out on Apple, so Apple decided to high a bunch of programmers and made Aperture.</p>
<p>Now what they are doing is making Aperture OSL and allowing all the people that make the awesome add-ons for photoshop to make and include them in Aperture when it is purchased. These add-ons up until recently were only available with Adobe Photoshop.</p>
<p>This has obviously pissed off Adobe, since now they will have a rival that offers everything they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t imagine that Apple would cancel 64-bit Carbon at the 11th hour just to keep Adobe from being competitive. Especially considering that it probably hurts other developers writing on top of Carbon with the intention of using the 64-bit API. Of course, on the flip side, they needed to cut Carbon loose sooner or later as it was just a backwards compatability thing. Saying they&#039;ll have it one year and then canning it the next is not good for third parties, though. 

More likely, I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s just that it&#039;s going to be very difficult for Adobe to move to Cocoa (which is 32- and 64-bit) and still be cross-platform. That sounds the most reasonable. 

Either that, or Microsoft was just doing their little payola thing to get them to develop/release their 64-bit version only for Windows. 

I&#039;m mainly curious to see what effect this has on design studios that operate with files over 3gb. They might really want to use something 64-bit capable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t imagine that Apple would cancel 64-bit Carbon at the 11th hour just to keep Adobe from being competitive. Especially considering that it probably hurts other developers writing on top of Carbon with the intention of using the 64-bit API. Of course, on the flip side, they needed to cut Carbon loose sooner or later as it was just a backwards compatability thing. Saying they&#8217;ll have it one year and then canning it the next is not good for third parties, though. </p>
<p>More likely, I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s just that it&#8217;s going to be very difficult for Adobe to move to Cocoa (which is 32- and 64-bit) and still be cross-platform. That sounds the most reasonable. </p>
<p>Either that, or Microsoft was just doing their little payola thing to get them to develop/release their 64-bit version only for Windows. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m mainly curious to see what effect this has on design studios that operate with files over 3gb. They might really want to use something 64-bit capable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-233</guid>
		<description>The cake is a lie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cake is a lie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil D</title>
		<link>http://www.curtsbasement.com/2008/04/photoshop-cs4-to-be-64-bit-on-windows-only/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtsbasement.com/?p=252#comment-232</guid>
		<description>They probably canned it for Macs simply because Apple is starting to push Aperture, it&#039;s home made photoshopesque software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They probably canned it for Macs simply because Apple is starting to push Aperture, it&#8217;s home made photoshopesque software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

